NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Heilpern v Anasco [2010] NSWSC 317
HEARING DATE(S) : 15 December 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 April 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Expedition List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
DECISION : Non est factum not established. The contract was not unjust. Decree for specific performance granted.
CATCHWORDS : DEEDS – non est factum – EQUITY – unconscionable and unjust transactions – statutory remedies under (NSW) Contracts Review Act 1980, s 7 – whether substantive injustice – whether procedural injustice – discretionary considerations
(NSW) Contracts Review Act 1980, s 7, s 9 LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002, s 64(2)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Antonovic v Volker (1986) 7 NSWLR 151 Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Karavas (1991) 23 NSWLR 256 Nguyen v Taylor (1992) 27 NSWLR 48 CASES CITED : Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Khoshaba [2006] NSWCA 41 Petelin v Cullen (1975) 132 CLR 355 St Clair v Petricevic (1988) ASC 55-688 St George Bank Ltd v Trimarchi [2004] NSWCA 120 West v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 610
PARTIES : Louise Heilpern (plaintiff) Elga Anasco (defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2009/290853
COUNSEL : Mr R Tregenza (plaintiff) Mr G Curtin (defendant)
SOLICITORS : Klimt & Associates (plaintiff) Boyd-Boland Law (defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION EXPEDITION LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate