NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Slocomb Investments Pty Ltd v JH & EJ Williams Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 918
HEARING DATE(S) : 16/08/10
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 August 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 16 August 2010
DECISION : I order that the plaintiff's originating process filed on 1 April 2010 be dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - demand based on Local Court judgment debt - Local Court makes order for payment by instalments after statutory demand served - four instalments paid - instalment order then set aside - later application for new instalment order refused - third application for instalment order filed but not determined - whether "some other reason" to set aside demand - held not - effect of four instalment payments discussed
Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 107 LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 459G, 459J(1)(b) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rule 37.5
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
CASES CITED : Eumina Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1998) 84 FCR 454 Tatlers.com.au Pty Limited v Davis [2006] NSWSC 1055; (2006) 203 FLR 473
PARTIES : Slocomb Investments Pty Ltd - Plaintiff JH & EJ Williams Pty Ltd - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2010/81855
COUNSEL : Mr A M Gruzman - Plaintiff Mr D A Moujalli - Defendant
SOLICITORS : Savio Solicitors - Plaintiff Russell J Baxter - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate