NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bagumya v Kakwano [2010] NSWSC 600
HEARING DATE(S) : 23 April 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 June 2010
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Rothman J at 1
(i) The application for leave to appeal and the appeal is dismissed;
(ii) The proceedings are dismissed; DECISION : (iii) The plaintiff shall pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to these proceedings, as agreed or assessed;
(iv) The stay order issued by the Registrar on 14 December 2009, in this matter, is, on and from the date of this judgment, set aside.
CATCHWORDS : APPEAL AND REVIEW – appeal from magistrate – contractual dispute – determined by magistrate on facts – not solely question of law – appeal dismissed and leave to appeal dismissed
LEGISLATION CITED : Contracts Review Act 1980 Local Court Act 2007
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Limited v Gardiner [2008] HCA 57; (2008) 238 CLR 570 Alramadan v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 322 Krishna v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 318; (2007) 178 A Crim R 220 CASES CITED : Rasic v R; Johnny Lee Vella v R; Damien Charles Vella v R [2009] NSWCCA 202 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; (2003) 198 ALR 59 The Queen v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex Parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co. Pty. Ltd. [1953] HCA 22; (1953) 88 CLR 100 Williams v R [1986] HCA 88; (1986) 161 CLR 278
PARTIES : Rukas Bagumya (Plaintiff) Thomas Kakwano (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate