NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Limited & Anor [2010] NSWSC 760
HEARING DATE(S) : 28 May 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 9 July 2010
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : McCallum J
(1) The defendant is to answer paragraph 11.1 of the plaintiff's third request for further and better particulars dated 10 May 2010. DECISION : (2) The defendant is to provide the further and better particulars of paragraphs 16(d) and (e) of the defence identified in paragraph 50 of this judgment. (3) The defendant is to provide the further and better particulars of paragraph 19 of the defence identified in paragraph 61 of this judgment.
CATCHWORDS : DEFAMATION - adequacy of particulars of defence - no matter of principle
Civil Procedure Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED : Defamation Act 1974 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads & Anor [2006] NSWSC 1226 CASES CITED : Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Limited [2007] NSWSC 1472 Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Ltd [2008] NSWCA 300 Sims v Wran [1984] 1 NSWLR 317
Abdullah Al-Shennag (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Statewide Roads Pty Limited (First Defendant) Bill Woodcock (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 05/269387
COUNSEL : In Person (Plaintiff) M.S. White (Second Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Norton Rose (Second Defendant)
- 19 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
McCALLUM J
9 JULY 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate