NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Perpetual Trustee Victoria v Yap [2010] NSWSC 761
HEARING DATE(S) : 24-28 May 2010, 1 June 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 July 2010
JUDGMENT OF : James J
DECISION : Findings that loan agreements were unjust and that it would be just to grant relief
CATCHWORDS : EJECTMENT — Consumer Credit Code ss 6(1), 6(5), 11(3), 11(4), 43(2), 80(3) — Contracts Review Act ss 7 and 9
LEGISLATION CITED : Contracts Review Act
Beckley v Consumer Trade and Tenancy Tribunal [2009] NSWSC 703 Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Karavas (1991) 23 NSWLR 257 Benjamin v Ashikian [2007] NSWSC 735 Commercial Bank of Australia Limited v Amadio (1982-1983) 151 CLR 447 Elkofairi v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd [2002] NSWCA 413, (2002) 11 BPR 20841 Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd v Tong (1997) 41 NSWLR 482 CASES CITED : Garcia v National Australia Bank (1998) 194 CLR 395 Jonsson v Arkway Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 815, 58 NSWLR 451 Kowalczuk v Accom Finance Pty Ltd (2008) 252 ALR 55 Nguyen v Taylor (1992) 27 NSWLR 48 Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd v Cook [2006] NSWSC 1104 Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Khoshaba [2006] NSWCA 41, 14 BPR 26639 Spina v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2009] NSWCA 206 Yerkey v Jones (1939) 63 CLR 649
Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited - Plaintiff PARTIES : Swee Lan Yap - First Defendant Edmond Dinkha Esho - Second Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2009/292006
COUNSEL : P Newton - Plaintiff G Donnellan - First Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate