NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : John Nelson Developments Pty Limited v Focus National Developments Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 150
HEARING DATE(S) : 8, 9, 10 and 11 December 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 March 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Ward J
1. A declaration that the first defendant is entitled to restitution in respect of the contributions it made pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement with the plaintiff towards the costs of their failed joint venture project, those contributions amounting to $90,086.22 excluding GST. 2. An order that the second defendant pay to the first defendant the controlled monies held in its trust account referable to the proceeds of sale of the property the subject of the joint venture and any interest which has accrued thereon. DECISION : 3. An order that any shortfall between the moneys held by the second defendant and the amount of $90,086.22 be paid by the plaintiff to the first defendant. 4. An order that the first defendant pay interest on the amount of the judgment debt from the date on which the sale proceeds were placed in the second defendant's trust account at court rates. 5 The plaintiff's statement of claim be dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT – joint venture agreement – expert determinations under terms of contract – whether expert determinations binding on the parties – whether expert has an obligation to accord procedural fairness– effect of mistake on the part of the expert –– scope of guarantee under the contract – EQUITY – declaration as a discretionary remedy – RESTITUTION – total failure of consideration – recovery of contributions to a joint venture where joint venture agreement does not contemplate events which have occurred
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate