NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : NSW Crime Commission v Lee [2010] NSWSC 1159
HEARING DATE(S) : 23 September 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 October 2010
JURISDICTION : COMMON LAW
JUDGMENT OF : Davies J
DECISION : The Applicant's Notice of Motion is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - procedure - confiscation of proceeds of crime - restraining or freezing order - - subsequent order that solicitor for the Defendant produce documents - whether order should have been made ex parte - whether illegitimate forensic advantage obtained by the Commission - redacted documents a sufficient answer to the order.
LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 New South Wales Crime Commission Act 1985
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Hamilton v Oades (1969) 166 CLR 486 Hong Kong Bank of Australia v Murphy (1992) 28 NSWLR 512 International Finance Trust Company Limited v New South Wales Crime Commission [2009] HCA 49; (2009) 240 CLR 319 North Australian Territory Co. v Goldsbrough, Mort & Co. [1893] 2 Ch 381 CASES CITED : NSW Crime Commission v Bonaccorso [2010] NSWSC 876 Pickles v Gratzon (2002) 55 NSWLR 533 Re Auto Import Co. (Australia) Ltd (1924) 25 SR (NSW) 52 Re Hugh J Roberts Pty Ltd (In Liq) and the Companies Act (1969) 91 WN (NSW) 537 State Drug Crime Commission v Larsson (1991) 53 A Crim R 131
Dennis Miralis (Applicant) PARTIES : NSW Crime Commission (Respondent/Plaintiff) Jason Lee (First Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2010/118966
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate