NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Onefone Australia Pty Limited v One.Tel Limited (In Liquidation) [2010] NSWSC 586 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 27/05/2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 27 May 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : White J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 27 May 2010
1. Order that if and insofar as an order has been made that the interlocutory process filed by the special purpose liquidator on 14 May 2010 be kept confidential and not be disclosed to any other person, that that order, in its application for interlocutory process, be discharged. DECISION : 2. Order that the special purpose liquidator's interlocutory process filed 14 May 2010 and the applicants' interlocutory process filed 26 May 2010 be removed into the Court of Appeal. 3. Order that the respondent to the applicants' interlocutory process filed 26 May 2010 file and serve within seven days any affidavit to be relied upon in relation to the interlocutory process. 4. Costs of the present application will be costs in the applicants' interlocutory process.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - previous orders made by Barrett J for confidentiality of evidence and reasons given on application by special purpose liquidator in respect of appointment and entry into agreements - application by committee of inspection for access to confidential evidence and reasons - application to stay and set aside orders - issues should be determined by Court of Appeal - removal of proceedings to Court of Appeal under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r 1.21 - relevant proceedings for removal under r 1.21
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate