NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Cleveland Investments Global Ltd v Evans [2010] NSWSC 567
HEARING DATE(S) : 14 and 25 May 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 1 June 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Ward J
DECISION : Defendant solicitor be restrained from acting in proceedings
CATCHWORDS : LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - application to restrain solicitor from acting against former client based on court's inherent jurisdiction over solicitors - principles upon which a solicitor will be restrained from acting against a former client - solicitor previously acted for company and received instructions from sole director - director removed from company and solicitor's retainer terminated - solicitor then commenced to act for former director against company in respect of same claim as that to which solicitor had previously acted for company - HELD - a fair-minded, reasonably informed member of the public would conclude that the proper administration of justice required that the solicitor be prevented from so acting - solicitor restrained from acting against former client
LEGISLATION CITED : Revised Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 1995 (NSW)
A v The Law Society of Tasmania [2001] TASSC 55; (2001) 10 Tas R 152 Asia Pacific Telecommunications Ltd v Optus Networks Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 550 Beach Petroleum NL v Kennedy [1999] NSWCA 408; (1999) 48 NSWLR 1 Belan v Casey [2002] NSWSC 58 Black v Taylor [1993] 3 NZLR 403 Bowen v Stott [2004] WASC 94 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Blanch [2004] NSWSC 70 Carindale Country Club Estate Pty Ltd v Astill (1993) 42 FCR 307; (1993) 115 ALR 112 D & J Constructions Pty Ltd v Head & Ors t/as Clayton Utz (1987) 9 NSWLR 118 Everingham v Ontario (1992) 88 DLR (4th) 755 Fordham v Legal Practitioners' Complaints Committee (1997) 18 WAR 467 Geelong School Supplies Pty Ltd v Dean [2006] FCA 1404 CASES CITED : Grimwade v Meagher [1995] 1 VR 446 Holborrow v Macdonald Rudder [2002] WASC 265 Ismail-Zai v the State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 150 Kallinicos v Hunt [2005] NSWSC 1181; (2005) 64 NSWLR 561 McVeigh v Linen House Pty Ltd [1999] VSCA 138; [1999] 3 VR 394 Newman v Phillips Fox (a firm) [1999] WASC 171; (1999) 21 WAR 309 PhotoCure ASA v Queen's University at Kingston [2002] FCA 905; (2002) 56 IPR 86 Pinnacle Living Pty Ltd v Elusive Image Pty Ltd [2006] VSC 202 Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (a firm) [1999] 2 AC 222; [1999] 1 All ER 517 Rakusen v Ellis Munday & Clarke [1912] 1 Ch 831 Sent v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2002] VSC 429 Spincode Pty Ltd v Look Software Pty Ltd [2001] VSCA 248; (2001) 4 VR 501 Wan v McDonald (1992) 33 FCR 491
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate