NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Johnson & Anor v Clancy & Anor [2010] NSWSC 1301
HEARING DATE(S) : 9 November 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 November 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Hallen AsJ
(a) The Plaintiffs to pay such of the Defendants' costs as, at the date on which the notice of discontinuance was filed, had been incurred by the Defendants in relation to each claim in respect of which the proceedings have been discontinued. DECISION : (b) In relation to the notice of motion filed on 8 October 2010, the result of the proceedings is that the Defendants have achieved the relief that they sought and had been seeking for some time. Accordingly, there is no reason why they should not have their costs of the notice of motion as well. (c) The Plaintiffs to pay the costs of the Defendants of the hearing of the costs argument. (d) The exhibits on the costs application to be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Procedure under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 - costs - leave granted, by consent, to the discontinuance of the Plaintiffs' proceedings - where no determination on the merits - default provision for costs in UCPR 42.19 - approach to costs - whether to depart from ordinary position - need for reason to depart from ordinary position - costs of notice of motion where orders made by consent which result in relief sought being granted by consent - costs of argument as to costs of proceedings where discontinuance
Civil Procedure Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY : Separate question
Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Ltd (1993) 44 FCR 194 Australiawide Airlines Ltd v Aspirion Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 365 Beeson v Carrello As Liquidator of Gecko Management Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2010] WASCA 155 Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 32 Edwards Madigan Torzillo Briggs Pty Ltd v Stack [2003] NSWCA 302 Fordyce v Fordham [2006] NSWCA 274 Foukkare v Angreb Pty Limited [2006] NSWCA 335 Luxmore Pty Ltd v Hydedale Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 212 CASES CITED : McClure v City of Stirling (No 3) [2009] WASC 247 Metro Chatswood Pty Ltd v CRI Chatswood Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1120 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 O'Neill v Mann [2000] FCA 1680 Ohn v Walton (1995) 36 NSWLR 77 One.Tel Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 101 FCR 548 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Pentroth Pty Ltd v Kirschild Pty Ltd (2006) 96 SASR 129 Perre v State of New South Wales [2009] NSWLEC 51 Pharmaust Ltd v Advance Healthcare Group Ltd [2007] WASC 125
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate