NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Savic & Ors v Kim [2010] NSWSC 1401
HEARING DATE(S) : 1 December 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Hallen AsJ
1. I order that the proceedings be heard consecutively with the evidence in one being evidence in the other. DECISION : 2. I order that each Summons be dismissed. 3. I make no order as to the Plaintiffs' costs, to the intent that she, and he, bears her, and his, own costs of the proceedings. 4. I direct that the exhibits and court books be returned.
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION - family provision orders sought - adequacy of provision - Plaintiffs - spouse and children of the deceased - estate left to de facto wife of deceased - small estate - financial and material circumstances of Plaintiffs - whether Plaintiffs have been left without adequate provision for proper maintenance and advancement in life - no provision to be made for Plaintiffs
LEGISLATION CITED : Succession Act 2006 Succession Amendment (Family Provision) Act 2008
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Bladwell v Davis & Anor [2004] NSWCA 170 Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [1938] AC 463 Cameron v Cameron [2009] SASC 27 Clifford v Mayr [2010] NSWCA 6 Collins v McGain [2003] NSWCA 190 Cooper v Dungan (1976) 50 ALJR 539 Devereaux-Warnes v Hall [No 3] [2007] WASCA 235; (2007) 35 WAR 127 Diver v Neal [2009] NSWCA 54 Foley v Ellis [2008] NSWCA 288 Golosky v Golosky (NSWCA, 8 September 1993, unreported) Goodman v Windeyer (1980) 144 CLR 490 Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 Heyward v Fisher (NSWCA, 26 April 1985, unreported) In the Estate of Puckridge, Deceased (1978) 20 SASR 72 Kleinig v Neal (No 2) (1981) 2 NSWLR 532 Luciano v Rosenblum (1985) 2 NSWLR 65 CASES CITED : McCosker v McCosker (1957) 97 CLR 566 McKenzie v Topp [2004] VSC 90 Magill v Magill [2006] HCA 51; (2006) 226 CLR 551 Marshall v Carruthers [2002] NSWCA 47 Mayfield v Lloyd-Williams [2004] NSWSC 419 O'Loughlin v O'Loughlin [2003] NSWCA 99 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales [1962] HCA 19; (1961) 107 CLR 9 Re Bull [2006] VSC 113 Re the Will of Sitch (deceased); Gillies v Executors of the Will of Sitch [2005] VSC 308 Samsley v Barnes [1990] NSWCA 161; (1991) DFC 95-100 Sellers v Scrivenger & Anor [2010] VSC 320 Singer v Berghouse (No 2) [1994] HCA 40; (1994) 181 CLR 201 Stern v Sekers; Sekers v Sekers [2010] NSWSC 59 Stott v Cook (1960) 33 ALJR 447 Vigolo v Bostin [2005] HCA 11; (2005) 221 CLR 191 Walker v Walker, (NSWSC, 17 May 1996, unreported) Welsh v Mulcock [1924] NZLR 673
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate