NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : In the matter of Phoenix Rising Investments Pty Ltd; Grace v Grace [2010] NSWSC 758
HEARING DATE(S) : 3 May 2010 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 3 May 2010
DECISION : Set aside paragraphs 1 and 4 of first and second defendants' notice to produce dated 9 March 2010
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – Supreme Court procedure – New South Wales – Procedure under Rules of Court – Evidence – Other Matters – Production of Documents – Notice to Produce – application to set aside – apparent relevance
LEGISLATION CITED : (CTH) Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 s 120(c) (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Pt 14 r 17
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
CASES CITED : Baldry v Jackson (1976) 2 NSWLR 415
David Alexander Grace (plaintiff) Deborah Sharon Grace (first defendant) Julienne Grace (second defendant) PARTIES : Nevilda Holdings Pty Ltd (prov liq'r appted) (third defendant) Nevilda Investments Pty Ltd (prov liq'r appted) (fourth defendant) Dutchie Pty Ltd (sixth defendant) Phoenix Rising Investments Pty Ltd (seventh defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 06/259566
S Goodman (plaintiff) COUNSEL : D Stewart (first, second & seventh defendants) N Cotman SC (prov liq'r for third defendant/applicant)
James Tuite & Associates (plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Clinch Long Letherbarrow Pty Ltd (first, second & seventh defendants) Breene & Breen Solicitors (third defendant/applicant & fourth defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate