NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd v Cassegrain; Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain & Co [2010] NSWSC 91
HEARING DATE(S) : 20 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 19 February 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
(1) Leave to be granted to amend statements of claim in derivative and in oppression proceedings, subject to some variations; DECISION : (2) subject to certain undertakings and indemnities being given, leave to be granted to bring derivative claims in oppression proceedings, and to join another person as defendant; (3) short minutes of orders to be brought in to reflect the Court's reasons; (4) plaintiff in each proceedings to pay defendants' costs thrown away by amendment, and subject thereto, costs of applications to be costs in the proceedings
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - statutory derivative action - pleadings - company asserts breach of duty against director and recipient from company of Torrens land - application for leave to amend to plead that director was agent for recipient - whether amendment alleged recipient had actual or imputed knowledge of wrongdoing - oppression proceedings - application to add derivative claims arising out of same facts - whether statutory derivative claims and oppression claims may be combined in single proceedings - whether company required to be a plaintiff in proceedings containing statutory derivative claims
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 79, 180-182, 232-234, 236-237
Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Brady v Stapleton (1952) 88 CLR 322 Cassegrain v Cassegrain [1998] FCA 811 Chahwan v Euphoric Pty Ltd trading as Clay & Michel [2008] NSWCA 52 Curtis v Price (1804) 12 Ves 89, 103 (33 ER 35, 40) Denis Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 976 Ehsman v Nutectime (2006) 56 ACSR 705, [2006] NSWSC 887 Fiduciary v Morningstar Research (2005) 53 ACSR 732, [2005] NSWSC 442 Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd v Cassegrain [2009] NSWSC 466 Goozee v Graphic World Group Holdings Pty Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 534, [2002] NSWSC 640 CASES CITED : Horton v Jones (No 2) (1939) 39 SR (NSW) 305 Intagro v ANZ Banking Group (2004) 50 ACSR 224 Keyrate Pty Ltd v Hamarc Pty Ltd (2001) 38 ACSR 396, [2001] NSWSC 491 Lakshman v Law Image [2002] NSWSC 888 Maher v Honeysett & Maher Electrical Contractors [2005] NSWSC 859 Matyear v Prismex Technologies Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 677 Metyor v Queensland Electronic Switching Pty Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 398; [2002] QCA 269 Minister v Tweed Byron Aboriginal Land Council (1990) 71 LGRA 201 Noakes v Harvy Holmes & Son (1979) 26 ALR 297 Swansson v RA Pratt Properties Pty Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 313, [2002] NSWSC 583 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate