NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : S v New South Wales Medical Board [2010] NSWSC 663
HEARING DATE(S) : 11 June 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 June 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Price J at 1
DECISION : 1. The summons is dismissed. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the first defendant.
CATCHWORDS : Administrative law - Professional Standards Committee - whether reasonable apprehension of bias
LEGISLATION CITED : Medical Practice Act 1992 s 36, s 61, s168, s 171, s 179(1)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Re Finance Sector Union of Australia; ex parte Illaton Pty Ltd (1992) 107 ALR 581 CASES CITED : Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 McGovern v Ku-Ring-Gai Council (2008) 72 NSWLR 504
PARTIES : S New South Wales Medical Board
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2010/144664
COUNSEL : Ms P Horvath - Plaintiff Ms K Richardson - First Defendant
SOLICITORS : Holman Webb Lawyers (Plaintiff)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
PRICE J
15 June 2010
2010/144664 S v New South Wales Medical Board
JUDGMENT 1 His Honour: These proceedings concern an allegation of a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of Dr Michael Lowy who is a member of a Professional Standards Committee (the Committee) which was constituted by the New South Wales Medical Board (the Board) under s 168 Medical Practice Act 1992, to hear a complaint against Dr S. As the hearing is fixed to commence on 17 June 2010, Dr S, the plaintiff, has urgently sought an order restraining the members of the Committee from further considering the complaint. He also seeks an order directing the Board to constitute a new Professional Standards Committee which does not include Dr Lowy as a member to hear the complaint.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate