NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : State of NSW v Johnson [2010] NSWSC 990
HEARING DATE(S) : 17 and 19 August 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 2 September 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Latham J at 1
DECISION : I make an extended supervision order pursuant to section 9(1)(a) of the Act, for a period of five years from 3 September 2010. I direct that pursuant to section 11 of the Act, the defendant comply with the conditions set out in the Schedule to the Amended Summons dated 16 August 2010 and attached to these reasons.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Crimes (Serious Sexual Offenders) Act 2006 - Extended supervision order for a period of 5 years - where defendant has lengthy criminal history for offences of sexual assault - where defendant has problem with alcohol abuse and history of non-compliance with parole and supervisory conditions - where evidence of high risk of recidivism
Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1998 Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
PARTIES : The State of NSW - (Plaintiff) Keith William Johnson - (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2010/114193
COUNSEL : Mr Kell - (Plaintiff) Mr Hoenig/Ms Ramsay - (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : IV Knight - Crown Solicitor - (Plaintiff) Aboriginal Legal Service
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
LATHAM J
2 SEPTEMBER 2010
2010/114193 THE STATE OF NSW v KEITH WILLIAM JOHNSON
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate