NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Kemp v French [2010] NSWSC 971
23 August 2010 HEARING DATE(S) : 24 August 2010 25 August 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 25 August 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Hallen AsJ
(a) Declare that the Plaintiff and the Defendant were living in a de facto relationship from in about June 2002 until about April 2005 and then from about October 2005 until about September 2007; DECISION : (b) Order the Defendant to pay to the Plaintiff $88,750; (c) Parties to bring in short minutes to give effect to the reasons; (d) Parties to argue costs.
CATCHWORDS : PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS - de facto relationships - adjustment of property interests - s 20 Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) - when de facto relationship commenced and ended - contributions made by parties and by mother of the Defendant - evaluation of any non-financial contributions - whether adjustive orders just and equitable in all circumstances
Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Property (Relationships) Act 1984
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Beattie v Reid [2002] NSWSC 1088 Beavan v Fallshaw (1992) 15 Fam L4 686 Bilous v Mudaliar [2006] NSWCA 38 Black v Black (1991) 15 Fam. LR 109 C v B [2007] 1 Qd R 212 Chanter v Catts [2005] NSWCA 411; (2005) 64 NSWLR 360 Cureton v Blackshaw Services Pty Limited [2002] NSWCA 187 Deves v Porter [2003] NSWSC 625 Dion v Rieser [2010] NSWSC 50 Evans v Marmont (1997) 42 NSWLR 70 Fletcher v Furnance [2008] NSWSC 132 Ghazal v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1992) 29 NSWLR 336 Henry v Ford (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 1254 CASES CITED : Howlett v Neilson [2005] NSWCA 149 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kardos v Sarbutt [2006] NSWCA 11 M and M (1998) FamCA 42 McKone v Maretta (1999) DFC Paino v Paino [2008] NSWCA 276 Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 Powell v Supresencia [2003] NSWCA 195 Re Q (Damages for sexual assault) (1994) 18 Fam LR 442 Reid v George (1996) Rose v Richards [2004] NSWSC 315 Ryan v Kalocsay [2010] NSWSC 620 Saric v Steward [2006] Selmore v Bull [2005] NSWCA 365 Sullman v Sullman [2002] NSWSC 169
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate