NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : State of NSW v Thomas [2010] NSWSC 677
HEARING DATE(S) : 21/06/2010, 22/06/2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 June 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Buddin J
DECISION : Pursuant to s 9(1) of the Act, I order that, for a period of four years from today, the defendant be subject to an extended supervision order by complying with the conditions set out in the Schedule to the amended summons.
CATCHWORDS : Serious sex offender - application for extended supervision order - no opposition to making of order or conditions attached thereto - issue as to duration of order
Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004 LEGISLATION CITED : Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWSC 605 Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 CASES CITED : Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 State of NSW v Quinn [2008] NSWSC 1080 State of New South Wales v Thomas [2010] NSWSC 314 Tillman v Attorney General for New South Wales (2007) 70 NSWLR 448
PARTIES : The State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Edward Reginald Thomas (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2010/85162
COUNSEL : C Adamson SC/A Mitchelmore (Plaintiff) D Thiering (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : IV Knight (Crown Solicitor) (Plaintiff) S O'Connor (Solicitor for Legal Aid) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate