NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : POTIER v ARNOTT & ORS [2010] NSWSC 144
HEARING DATE(S) : 18 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 9 March 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Hulme J at 1
(i) I refuse Mr Potier leave to bring against Mr David Arnott, the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Attorney-General proceedings upon the basis of the matters referred to in the Summons, Statement of Claim and Statement of Issues marked as filed in the Common Law Division of this Court and given number 16303/2008 DECISION : (ii)I refuse Mr Potier leave to bring against McGowan Lawyers (or the members of that firm) and Mr T Healey proceedings upon the basis of the matters referred to in the Summons, Statement of Claim and Statement of Issues marked as filed in the Common Law Division of this Court and given number 16305/2008. (iii) I refuse Mr Potier leave to bring against the Commissioner, Department of Corrective Services, proceedings upon the basis of the matters referred to in the Summons, Statement of Claim and Statement of Issues marked as filed in the Common Law Division of this Court and given number 16307/2008. (iv) I refuse Mr Potier leave to bring against the Legal Aid Commission proceedings upon the basis of the matters referred to in the Summons, Statement of Claim and Statement of Issues marked as filed in the Common Law Division of this Court and given number 16296/2008.
Malcolm Potier (Plaintiff) David Arnott SC (First Defendant) PARTIES : McGowan Lawyers (2nd Defendant) Department of Corrective Services (3rd Defendant) Legal Aid Commission of NSW (4th Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 16303/2008; 16305/2008; 163007/2008; 16296/2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate