NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Banksia Mortgages Limited v Croker and Ors [2010] NSWSC 883
HEARING DATE(S) : 5 August 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 6 August 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Schmidt J
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - discovery and interrogatories - discovery and inspection of documents - orders for further discovery refused - leave to rely on further lay and expert evidence - leave granted in part - leave under section 168 of Evidence Act 1995 refused - orders under section 169 of Evidence Act 1995 refused
Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2005] NSWCA 152; (2005) 218 ALR 764 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 70; (2007) 159 FCR 397 CASES CITED : Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Rhoden v Wingate [2002] NSWCA 165 Sydneywide Distributors v Red Bull Australia Pty Limited [2002] FCAFC 157; (2002) 55 IPR 354 Trimcoll Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2007] NSWCA 307
Banksia Mortgages Limited - Plaintiff PARTIES : Leslie William Croker - First Defendant Ruth Christine Corker - Second Defendant Carigan Pty Limited - Third Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2009/295278
COUNSEL : Mr GC Lindsay SC with Mr P Bolster - Plaintiff Mr R Newell - Defendants
SOLICITORS : Kell Moore - Plaintiff Simmons & McCartney - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate