NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lillis v Lillis [2010] NSWSC 359
HEARING DATE(S) : 21 April 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 April 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton AJ
DECISION : Plaintiff's claim dismissed with no order as to costs.
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION [321] – Family provision and maintenance – Principles upon which relief granted – Application of children – Adult son. - SUCCESSION [335] – Family provision – Practice – Costs – Unsuccessful plaintiff.
LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 ss 7 and 9
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Carey v Robson [2009] NSWSC 1199 Day v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [2001] NSWSC 394 Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 Hughes v Hughes NSWCA 6 June 1989 unreported Hughes v National Trustees Executors and Agency Co of Australasia Ltd (1979) 143 CLR 134 Hunter v Hunter (1987) 8 NSWLR 573 CASES CITED : Massingham v Massingham NSWCA 27 June 1996 unreported Moussa v Moussa [2006] NSWSC 509 Permanent Trustee Co Ltd v Fraser (1995) 36 NSWLR 24 Re Sherborne Estate No 2; Vanvalen v Neaves [2005] NSWSC 1003 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Walker v Walker NSWSC 17 May 1996 unreported
PARTIES : John Anthony Lillis (P) David James Lillis (D)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2009/287676
COUNSEL : R W Tregenza (P) B Townsend (D)
SOLICITORS : Russell Kelly & Associates (P) Butlers Will Dispute Lawyers (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate