NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Robbins v The Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2010] NSWSC 39
HEARING DATE(S) : 08/02/10
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 February 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Order for determination of separate question.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - motion by defendant for separate determination of preliminary question - question whether limitation defence made out - whether suitable for separate determination
Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 56(1) and (2) LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969, ss 14(1)(d), 47(1)(c), Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rule 28.2
CATEGORY : Separate question
Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2000] NSWSC 1215 Integral Home Loans Pty Ltd v Interstar Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1464 CASES CITED : Johnson v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church [2009] NSWSC 309 O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 14; (1991) 171 CLR 232 Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board [2001] HCA 19; (2001) 206 CLR 1 Wardley Australia Ltd v State of Western Australia [1992] HCA 55; (1992) 175 CLR 514
Thomas Hamilton Robbins - First Plaintiff PARTIES : Dawn Evelyn Robbins - Second Plaintiff The Royal Bank of Scotland plc - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2009/290239
COUNSEL : Ms P Kerr - Plaintiffs Mr P Durack SC - Defendant
SOLICITORS : Thomas Booler & Co - Plaintiffs Allens Arthur Robinson - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate