NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 77 NSWLR 136
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Carey v ABC [2010] NSWSC 709
HEARING DATE(S) : 9 & 10 June 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 June 2010
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : McCallum J
1. The plaintiff's oral application for leave under s 23 of the Defamation Act 2005 to bring the present proceeding is dismissed. DECISION : 2. The plaintiff's notice of motion dated 1 May 2009 is dismissed. 3. The proceedings are dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : DEFAMATION - application under s 23 of the Defamation Act 2005 for leave to bring further proceedings - whether leave may be given retrospectively - DEFAMATION - appliction for extension of time within which to bring proceedings - substantive law applicable - whether "not reasonable in the circumstances" for plaintiff to have commenced an action within the limitation period - where plaintiff had limited access to funds - where complaint made under defendant's internal complaints process
Choice of Law (Limitation Period) Act 1993 (NSW) Defamation Act 1974 LEGISLATION CITED : Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Limitation Act 2005 (WA)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Ahmed v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 676 Commercial Union Assurance Co v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] HCA 12; 223 CLR 1 Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575 Macquarie Bank Limited v Berg [2002] NSWSC 254 CASES CITED : Maple v David Syme & Co Ltd [1975] 1 NSWLR 97 Murphy v Lewis [2009] QDC 37 Noonan v Maclennan [2010] QCA 50 Rainey v The State of Western Australia (No 3) [2010] WASC 83 Rodgers v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWDC 275 Segal v Waverley Council (2005) 64 NSWLR 177 Spautz v Kirby (1989) 21 NSWLR 27
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate