NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Londish v Sheahan & Ors – In re Valofo Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 337
HEARING DATE(S) : 24 February 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 28 April 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J
DECISION : Judgment for Defendants on Statement of Claim.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS – ADMINISTRATION – LIQUIDATION – Whether company placed in administration although not insolvent – whether administration and subsequent liquidation for proper purpose – whether position of administrators and liquidators so compromised that they should be replaced.
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – s 435A, s 436A, s 447A(4)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
- Citrix Systems Inc v Telesystems Learning Pty Ltd (in liq) (1998) 28 ACSR 529 CASES CITED : - Kazar v Duus (1998) 29 ACSR 321 - Londish v Sheahan & Lock in Re Valofo Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1175
Peter Londish (Plaintiff) PARTIES : John Sheahan and Ian Lock (First Defendants) David Bowman (Second Defendant) Sidney Londish (Third Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 09/291621
S.J. Burchett (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : A.P. Coleman (First Defendant – Submitting Appearance) J. Stoljar SC, Ms A Horvath (Second and Third Defendants)
Hartmann & Associates (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : O'Neill Partners (First Defendant – Submitting Appearance) Philip Evans & Associates (Second and Third Defendants)
2009/291621 In re Valofo Pty Ltd: Londish v Sheahan & Ors
JUDGMENT
28 April, 2010
Introduction
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate