NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Coyne v Calabro (No. 7) [2010] NSWSC 846
HEARING DATE(S) : 21 and 22 July 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 July 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : White J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 22 July 2010
DECISION : Refer to para 28 of judgment.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS – where multiple defendants unsuccessful in proceedings and liable to pay damages to plaintiffs – whether defendants to be jointly and severally for plaintiffs' costs of entire proceedings – whether more just that second defendant or plaintiff should bear risk of first defendant's insolvency - COSTS – where defendants did not accept Calderbank offer made by plaintiffs – whether plaintiffs entitled to indemnity costs - COSTS – whether plaintiffs entitled to order in the nature of Bullock order in respect of costs of cross-defendant payable by plaintiffs – whether defendants' conduct make it fair to impose liability on them for costs of cross-defendant
Cheques Act 1986 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
Coyne v Calabro (No. 5) [2010] NSWSC 694 Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3) (1979) 28 ALR 201; 42 FLR 213 CASES CITED : Mike Gaffikin Marine Pty Ltd v Princes Street Marina Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Young J, 15 July 1996, unreported) Probiotec Ltd v University of Melbourne [2008] FCAFC 5; (2008) 166 FCR 30 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate