NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : AVS Group of Companies Pty Limited and Ors v Commissioner of Police and Anor [2010] NSWSC 109
HEARING DATE(S) : 17 December 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 February 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Schmidt J
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - administrative tribunals - Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) - declaratory relief - challenge to the revocation of licences under the Security Industry Act 1997 - confidential exhibit not disclosed to plaintiffs pursuant to s 29(3) of the Security Industry Act 1997 - whether proposed special advocate procedure could be adopted under the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 - section 29(3) of the Security Industry Act 1997 and its interaction with the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 - special advocate must be appointed by plaintiffs - whether there was power to disclose confidential exhibit to proposed special advocate without consent of Commissioner of Police - consent required - whether Police Commissioner's discretion under s 29(3) of the Security Industry Act 1997 exercised validly - discretion not validly exercised - declarations and orders made
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 LEGISLATION CITED : Guardianship Act 1987 Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (UK) Security Industry Act 1997 Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 Supreme Court Act 1970
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Abernathy v Deitz (1996) 39 NSWLR 701 AVS Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police [2009] NSWSC 1391 Cameron North Sydney Investments Pty Ltd v The Owners Strata Plan No 50411 and Ors [2002] NSWSC 726 Commissioner of Police v AVS Group of Companies Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1408 Commissioner of Police v Gray [2009] NSWCA 49 Gypsy Jokers Motorcycle Club Inc v Commissioner of Police [2007] WASCA 49 John Fairfax and Sons Limited v Australian Telecommunications Commission [1977] 2 NSWLR 400 CASES CITED : M v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 324; (2004) 2 ALL ER 863 Secure Funding Pty Limited v Coughlin [2009] NSWSC 384 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman [2000] 3 All ER 778 R v H; R v C (2004) 2 AC 134; [2004] 1 ALL ER 1269 R v Khazaal [2006] NSWSC 1061 R v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 586 R v Trebilco; ex parte FS Falkiner & Sons Ltd [1936] HCA 63; (1936) 56 CLR 20 Stubbs v NRMA Insurance Ltd (1997) 42 NSWLR 550 Woodside Energy Ltd v Alinta Sales Pty Ltd [2009] WASC 147
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate