NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : BRGM Nominees Pty Ltd v Garling [2010] NSWSC 273
HEARING DATE(S) : 29-31 March, 1,6 April 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 April 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Biscoe AJ
DECISION : 1. First cross claim dismissed 2. Declarations and orders as sought in second cross claim 3. Order Max Michael Garling to pay the other parties' costs 4. Exhibits and Court Book may be returned
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT - whether oral contract that A would pay B amount equal to 30 per cent of net sale proceeds of a gold mine if B put a structure in place whereby it could be sold and found a buyer - if so, whether agreement activated by B's performance of terms - TRUSTS - whether B's share in C held as nominee for or on trust for A - whether C's shares in a gold mine held as trustee for A's family trust
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
BRGM Nominees Pty Ltd (plaintiff, second cross defendant to first cross claim) Max Michael Garling (defendant, first cross claimant, first cross defendant to second cross claim) Raymond Francis Wright (first cross defendant to first cross claim, second cross claimant) Nickel Seekers Mining Services Pty Ltd (third cross defendant to first cross claim) PARTIES : Nickelseekers Pty Ltd (fourth cross defendant to first cross claim) Ridgeview Nominees Pty Ltd (second cross defendant to second cross claim) Write Family Investments Pty Ltd (third cross defendant to second cross claim)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2008/00280210
COUNSEL : Mr D L Cook (plaintiff, cross defendants to first cross claim, second cross claimant) Mr J Stevenson SC and Ms C Spruce (defendant, first cross claimant, first cross defendant to second cross claim)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate