NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Fardell v Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 346
HEARING DATE(S) : 18, 19 and 20 August 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 28 April 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : White J
DECISION : I give verdict and direct entry of judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $819,180.50. I will hear the parties on costs. The exhibits may be returned after 28 days.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT – EMPLOYMENT – employee was senior executive – participant in employee incentive schemes – employment contract provided for notice periods for termination of employment and payments to employee on termination – contract allowed employee to terminate contract for change of control of employer leading to material diminution of role and responsibilities and additional payment in lieu of notice – takeover of employer – employee gave conditional notice under change of control provision – employer terminated contract and employment - CONTRACT – construction of contract – employee not entitled to benefits under employee incentive schemes if employment terminated earlier – entitled to pro-rata benefits under transitional arrangements and amended employee incentive schemes – purported amendments of incentive schemes effective – plaintiff entitled to benefits under schemes as amended - CONTRACT – employee gave valid termination notice – change of control leading to material diminution in role and responsibilities – "entitlement" to more than 50% of shares in employer includes equitable interest – requirements for valid notice of termination – conditional notice valid provided condition is certain – notice operates on fulfilment of condition – employer wrongly terminated employment after valid notice given – breach of implied term not to hinder or prevent fulfilment of purpose of provision in contract – employee entitled to damages equal to amount payable under provision - CONTRACT – employee not entitled to redundancy payments – damages not reduced by earnings made after termination – employee entitled to be put in same position had contract been performed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate