NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Adam v Sara [2010] NSWSC 530
HEARING DATE(S) : 19 May 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 May 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Buddin J
DECISION : The Notice of Motion is dismissed. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs.
CATCHWORDS : Procedure - transfer of proceedings from District Court to Supreme Court - whether relief available in District Court
Contracts Review Act 1980 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Code Act 1995 (C'th) District Court Act Fair Trading Act Supreme Court Act 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Bushby v Dixon Holmes Du Pont Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 234 CASES CITED : Guthrie v Spence [2009] NSWCA 369 Harbourside Catering Pty Ltd v TMG Developments Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 631 Trilogy Corporate Solutions & Anor v Fitzroy Shopfitting & Building Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1026
PARTIES : Nadia Adam (Applicant) Edward Sara (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2010/87085
COUNSEL : D Allen (Applicant) B Pluznyk (Respondent)
SOLICITORS : Proctor & Associates (Applicant) Joseph G Capogreco & Associates(Respondent)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
BUDDIN J
WEDNESDAY 26 MAY 2010
2010/87085 – NADIA ADAM v EDWARD SARA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate