NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd v Zepinic & Anor [No 7] [2010] NSWSC 680
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 June 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Slattery J at 1
DECISION : I dismiss Chateau's application for indemnity costs after the 3rd of December 2009 in these proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Costs - existing order for costs onthe ordinary basis - application for indemnity costs - conduct of unsuccessful parties does not warrant making an order for indemnity costs - application dismissed.
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited v Zepinic & Anor [No. 3][2009] NSWSC 1373 Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd v Zepinic & Anor [No. 5] [2010] NSWSC 265 Degman Pty Limited (In liquidation) v Wright (No 2) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354 CASES CITED : Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 54 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Re Wilcox; Venture Industries Pty Ltd (No. 2) (1996) 72 FCR 151 Baillieu Knight Frank (NSW) Pty Ltd v Ted Manny Real Estate Pty Ltd (1992) 30 NSWLR 359 Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd v Gordian Runoff Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 12
Plaintiff: Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited PARTIES : First Defendant: Milla Zepinic Second Defendant: Vito Zepinic
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4643/09
COUNSEL : Plaintiff: Mr B Ilkovski Defendants: Dr Zepinic (self represented)
Plaintiff: Toomey Pegg Drevikovsky Lawyers SOLICITORS : Defendants: Dr Zepinic (self represented)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate