NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 78 NSWLR 111
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bushby v Dixon Holmes du Pont Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 234 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 10 March 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 March 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Rein J
DECISION : 1. Summons dismissed. 2. Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of the Summons.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - inferior courts - New South Wales - District Court - removal into Supreme Court - PROCEDURE - miscellaneous procedural matters - declarations - appropriate form of relief: discretion of court - futility of declaration - ESTOPPEL - promissory estoppel - whether promissory estoppel can be pleaded as an equitable defence as well as an equitable claim - whether District Court has jurisdiction to deal with promissory estoppel as an equitable defence - PROCEDURE - whether proceedings should be transferred to the Supreme Court pursuant to Civil Procedure Act s 140 due to the absence of injunctive relief for promissory estoppel, having regard to various factors relating to the utility of the claim, the availability of other remedies and relief under the Fair Trading Act and other claims, and the availability of transfer to the Supreme Court (and re-transfer to the District Court) under Civil Procedure Act s 144
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) County Courts Act 1959 (7 & 8 Eliz 2 c 22) District Court Act 1973 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Law Reform (Law and Equity) Act 1972 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 (37 & 37 Vict c 66) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate