NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Limited [2010] NSWSC 969
HEARING DATE(S) : 27 August 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 2 September 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Harrison J
DECISION : The notices of motion filed by the first and second defendants seeking leave respectively to withdraw admissions made by the first defendant in paragraph 10 of its defence filed 9 November 2006 and by the second defendant in paragraph 5 of its defence filed 4 December 2006 to the amended statement of claim filed 26 September 2006 should be dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – UCPR 12.6 – admissions – withdrawal of admissions – application for leave – whether defendants entitled to withdraw an admission that they jointly contracted with a third party for aerial spraying on the plaintiff's land – whether withdrawal necessary to expose real issues in dispute – whether true position was that separate contracts entered creating several liability – whether Court liable to determine an issue based upon a fiction unless leave granted - delay – where admissions made five and a half years previously – actual and presumptive prejudice – leave refused.
LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Civil Procedure Act 2005
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 (2009) 239 CLR 175 Bank of Western Australia v Salmon [No 1] [2009] NSWSC 224 Coopers Brewery Ltd v Panfida Foods Ltd (1992) 26 NSWLR 738 Dennis v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2008] NSWCA 37 CASES CITED : Drabsch v Switzerland General Insurance Co Ltd (Supreme Court of New South Wales Santow J 16 October 1996 unreported) Maile v Rafiq [2005] NSWCA 410 The Nominal Defendant v Gabriel [2007] NSWCA 52 (2007) 71 NSWLR 150
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate