NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hollingsworth v Thompson [2010] NSWSC 1175
HEARING DATE(S) : 13 October 2010 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton AJ
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 13 October 2010
DECISION : As and from 6 August 2010 the plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs of the proceedings, otherwise no order as to costs.
CATCHWORDS : FAMILY LAW AND CHILD WELFARE [500] – De Facto Relationships – Adjustment of property interests – Other matters – Costs – Relevant principles
LEGISLATION CITED : Property (Relationships) Act 1984 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 42.1
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
Baker v Towle [2008] NSWCA 73 Bilous v Mudaliar (2006) 65 NSWLR 615 CASES CITED : Dunstan v Rickwood (No 2) (2007) 38 Fam LR 491 Hayes v Marquis [2008] NSWCA 10 Hollingsworth v Thompson [2010] NSWSC 1033 Kardos v Sarbutt (No 2) (2006) 34 Fam LR 550
Plaintiff - Allan Francis Hollingsworth PARTIES : Defendant 1 - Peta Marie Thompson Defendant 2 - L & L Luxor PTY Limited ACN 075 937 503
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2008/277274
Plaintiff - Mr David Dura COUNSEL : Defendant 1 - Mr C Simpson SC Defendant 2 - No appearance
Plaintiff - Doyle Edwards Anderson Lawyers Pty Ltd SOLICITORS : Defendant 1 - Christopher Hughes Family Lawyer, Lismore Defendant 2 - No appearance
- 4 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
HAMILTON AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate