NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Brags Electrics Pty Ltd trading as Inscope Building Technologies v Steven Mark Gregory [2010] NSWSC 1205
HEARING DATE(S) : 6 September 2010 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 6 September 2010
DECISION : Decline to set aside Anton Piller order
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – Discovery and interrogatories – Discovery and inspection of documents – Production and inspection – Generally – Anton Piller orders – whether Anton Piller order should be discharged – where application made after execution – when Anton Piller order may be discharged – grounds for discharge – procedure and evidence on application for discharge – evidence additional to that on ex parte application – evidence of "fruits of order"
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
CASES CITED : Austress Freyssinet Pty Ltd v Joseph [2006] NSWSC 77 WEA Records Ltd v Visions Channel 4 Limited [1983] 2 All ER 589
PARTIES : Brags Electrics Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Steven Mark Gregory (defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10/142180
COUNSEL : Mr G Boyce (plaintiff) Ms B Obradovic (defendant)
SOLICITORS : NECA Legal (plaintiff) CA Williams Legal (defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BRERETON J
Monday, 6 September 2010
2010/142180 Brags Electrics Pty Limited t/as Inscope Building Technologies v Steven Mark Gregory JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: The plaintiff Brags Electrics Pty Limited carries on business under the name Inscope Building Technologies, specialising in the design, installation and maintenance of buildings automation and control systems and claiming to have extensive expertise and experience in control systems designed for heating, ventilation and air-conditioning, intelligent lighting control, fire services, hydraulic services, access control and security systems and computer room environmental monitoring systems. It provides these services through building management control systems (BMCS) installed by its clients, the owners of the various buildings which it services, and to which it obtains access via a user name and password. Relevantly, access is required both to the "platform" (which is essentially the hardware) and the "station" (which is essentially the software) that drives the relevant BCMS. Sites currently served by the plaintiff include Century Business Estate at Baulkham Hills, the Roads and Traffic Authority building in Argyle Street, Parramatta, and Dubbo Civic Centre.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate