NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Miskovic v Stryke Corporation Pty Ltd trading as KSS Security [2010] NSWSC 128
HEARING DATE(S) : 25 May 2009-29 May 2009, 1 June 2009-2 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 19 April 2010
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Rothman J
(i) Judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff;
(ii) Judgment for the cross-defendant on the cross-claim;
DECISION : (iii) The plaintiff shall pay 80% of the costs of the defendant of and incidental to these proceedings, as agreed or assessed;
(iv) The cross-claimant/defendant shall pay the costs of the cross-defendant of and incidental to these proceedings, as agreed or assessed;
(v) The parties be granted leave to seek any different or special order for costs within 14 days of the date hereof and to seek a full assessment of the damages that, but for the determination on liability, would have been awarded.
CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE – psychiatric injury – overwork in employment – security industry – causation – duty of care – no foreseeable risk of sustaining a recognisable psychiatric injury, which was not far-fetched or fanciful – want of care as to regular welfare checks – not causative of injury - TRADE PRACTICES – s 53B of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – no relevant conduct liable to mislead – query whether representation that forms part of contract of employment can amount to contravention of section - INSURANCE – indemnity for liability for injury to worker not cover damages for contravention of s 53B of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Liability Act 2002 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate