NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v John Edward Atkinson & Ors [2010] NSWSC 42
HEARING DATE(S) : 2/02/10, 3/02/10
JUDGMENT DATE : 11 February 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
DECISION : Applicants entitled to relief sought.
CATCHWORDS : Proceedings represent aftermath of decision of the High Court of Australia in Agricultural and Rural Finance v Gardiner [2008] HCA 57 - Failure by the plaintiff to serve the applicants until late 2008 being well after the hearings at first instance, in the Court of Appeal and the High Court - Applications for orders discharging extension orders - Consideration of the nature of the discretion - Consideration of the factors to be taken into account in the exercise of the discretion
ASIC Act 2001 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner [2008] HCA 57 Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Atkinson [2006] NSWSC 202 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Arthur Andersen Corporate Finance Pty Ltd v Buzzle Operations Pty Ltd (in liq) [2009] NSWCA 104 Battersby v Anglo American Oil Co Limited [1945] KB 23 Brealey v Board of Management Royal Perth Hospital [1999] WASCA 158; (1999) 21 WAR 79 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; (1996) 186 CLR 541 CDJ v VAJ (No 1) [1998] HCA 67; (1998) 197 CLR 172 CASES CITED : Chalmers & Partners v Kensit [2008] WASCA 122 Foxe v Brown [1984] HCA 69; (1984) 59 ALJR 186 Dagnell v JL Freedman & Co [1993] 1 WLR 388 Gardiner v Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd. [2007] NSWCA 235 IMB Group Pty Limited (in liq) v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2006] QCA 407; [2007] 1 Qld Rep 148 Klein v Domus Pty Limited (1963) 109 CLR 467 Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Barbrak Ltd [1987] AC 597 Regie National des Usines Renault SA v Zhang [2002] HCA 10; (2002) 210 CLR 491 Van Leer Australia Pty Limited v Palace Shipping KK [1981] HCA 11; (1981) 180 CLR 337 Victa Limited v Johnson (1975) 10 SASR 496
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate