NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hudson v NSW State Parole Authority [2010] NSWSC 287
HEARING DATE(S) : 31 March 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 April 2010
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Hislop J
DECISION : Application dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - parole - s 155 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999.
LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Administration of Sentence) Act 1999
LMS v Parole Board (1999) 110 A Crim R 172 CASES CITED : McCamley v Offenders Review Board (unreported, NSWCCA, 9 February 1994) Jim Lee v State Parole Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 1225 Rozynski v Parole Board of New South Wales [2003] NSWCCA 214
PARTIES : Thomas William Hudson (Applicant) NSW State Parole Authority (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2010/52750
COUNSEL : In person (Applicant) C. Lonergan (Respondent)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HISLOP J
Thursday 22 April 2010
2010/52750 THOMAS WILLIAM HUDSON v NSW STATE PAROLE AUTHORITY
JUDGMENT
Introduction 1 The applicant, Thomas William Hudson, was convicted at trial of three offences, namely attempting to manufacture ephedrine, attempting to manufacture methylamphetamine and conspiring with others to manufacture ephedrine. 2 He was sentenced for each offence to imprisonment for a non parole period of three years commencing on 17 August 2006 and expiring on 16 August 2009 with a balance of term of two years commencing on 17 August 2009 and expiring on 16 August 2011. The sentences were to be served concurrently. 3 On 2 July 2009 the respondent, NSW State Parole Authority, directed that the applicant be released to parole on 16 August 2009. The parole order contained a number of conditions, including: "3. The offender must, while on release on parole, adapt to normal lawful community life."
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate