NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Chidiac v Maatouk [2010] NSWSC 386
HEARING DATE(S) : 18, 19 February 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 4 May 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Ward J
1. Order the first defendant pay to the plaintiff, for the benefit of the estate of the late Peter Maatouk Snr the sum of $246,540 plus interest from the date on which demand for repayment was made to date. DECISION : 2. Dismiss the plaintiff's claims against the second defendant. 3. Stand over for submissions on costs.
CATCHWORDS : LOAN - payment of money held to be made under an enforceable loan agreement between plaintiff and first defendant - first defendant ordered to repay loan amount - CONTRIBUTION - principles concerning doctrine of contribution - no right of contribution in absence of common intention between co-borrowers that second defendant be responsible for repayment - UNJUST ENRICHMENT - claims based on unjust enrichment fail - not sufficient merely to show receipt of benefit by first and second defendants - necessary to establish basis on which retention of benefit unjust - LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - date of accrual of cause of action based on a debt or unjust enrichment - existence of confirmation of debt and operation of s 54 of Limitation Act - proceedings commenced within limitation period - PLEADINGS - necessary to plead factors giving rise to claim for unjust enrichment
LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 (NSW)
Albion Insurance Co Ltd v GIO (NSW) [1969] HCA 55; (1969) 121 CLR 342 Anon, (1293) Y.B 21-22 Edw. I. (R.S.) 110-111 Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon [1993] HCA 4; (1993) 176 CLR 344; (1993) 111 ALR 289 Bhupinder Sekhon v Sharangjit Cour Sekhon [2007] NSWSC 875 BP Petroleum Development Ltd v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd [1987] SLT 345 Brott v Grey [2000] FCA 1727 Burke v LFOT Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 17; (2002) 209 CLR 282; (2002) 187 ALR 612 Capita Financial Group Limited v Rothwells Limited (1993) 30 NSWLR 619 Clune v Collins Angus & Robertson Publishers Pty Limited (1992) 25 IPR 246 Cockburn v GIO Finance Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWCA 177; (2001) 51 NSWLR 624 Coshott v Lenin [2007] NSWCA 153 Coulls v Bagot's Executor & Trustee Co Limited (1967) 119 CLR 460 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1992] HCA 48; (1992) 175 CLR 353 Dering v Earl of Winchelsea (1787) 1 Cox 318; 29 ER 1184; [1775-1802] All ER Rep 140 Dinsdale bht Protective Commissioner v Arthur [2006] NSWSC 809; (2006) 12 BPR 23,514 Faraday v Rappaport [2007] NSWSC 34 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89; (2007) 236 ALR 209 Forgeard v Shanahan (1994) 35 NSWLR 206 Gleeson v Gleeson [2002] NSWSC 418 Haller v Arye [2005] QCA 224; (2005) 2 Qd R 410 Hoy Mobile Pty Ltd v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 810; [2008] ATPR 42-240 CASES CITED : Jones v Padavatton [1969] 1 WLR 328 Ingram v Ingram [1941] VLR 95 Lactos Fresh Pty Ltd v Finishing Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 748 Lewis v Lewis & Anor [2001] NSWSC 321 Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Limited [2008] HCA 27; (2008) 232 CLR 635; (2008) 247 ALR 412 Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Malco Engineering Pty Limited v Ferreira & ors (1994) 10 NSWCCR 117 Muschinski v Dodds [1985] HCA 78; (1985) 160 CLR 583 Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Citibank Savings Ltd (1995) 38 NSWLR 116 Ogilvie v Adams [1981] VR 1041 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul [1987] HCA 5; (1987) 162 CLR 221 Plunkett v Bull (1915) 19 CLR 544 Re Brookers (Aust) Ltd (in liq); Brooker v Pridham (1986) 41 SASR 380 Re Hodgson (1886) 31 Ch D 177 Switz Pty Ltd v Glowbind Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 222 Torrens Aloha Pty Ltd v Citibank NA [1997] FCA 77; (1997) 72 FCR 581; (1997) 144 ALR 89; (1997) 35 ATR 36 VL Finance Pty Ltd v Legudi [2003] VSC 57; (2003) 54 ATR 221 Vukic v Luca Grbin and Ors; Estate of Zvonko Grbin [2006] NSWSC 41 Wasada Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (No.2) [2003] NSWSC 987 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 35 Weeks v Hrubala [2008] NSWSC 162 Young v Queensland Trustees Ltd [1956] HCA 51; (1956) 99 CLR 560; [1956] ALR 939
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate