NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Pawlowska v Zajglic (Costs) [2010] NSWSC 1276
HEARING DATE(S) : 27 September 2010 JURISDICTION : Equity Division Duty List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 27 September 2010
DECISION : The defendant's costs payable by the plaintiff be assessed on an indemnity basis from 18 February 2010.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – Costs – Indemnity costs – where defendant obtains order more favourable than defendant's offer of compromise.
LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Family Provision Act 1982, s 7 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, pt 20 div 4, r 42.15A
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
CASES CITED : Pawlowska v Zajglic [2010] NSWSC 864
PARTIES : Helena Pawlowska (plaintiff/respondent) Andrzej Mieczyslaw Zajglic (defendant/applicant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 08/280532
COUNSEL : G Foster (plaintiff/respondent) R Hanrahan (defendant/applicant)
SOLICITORS : Jay Oslanicki Solicitor (plaintiff/respondent) Drexler & Partners (defendant/applicant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION DUTY LIST
BRERETON J
Monday, 27 September 2010
2008/280532 Helena Pawlowska v Andrzej Mieczyslaw Zajglic JUDGMENT (ex tempore) 1 HIS HONOUR: On 6 August 2010, Ball J dismissed with costs the application of the plaintiff Helena Pawlowska for provision pursuant to (NSW) Family Provision Act 1982, s 7, out of the estate of her late mother, of which the defendant Andrzej Mieczyslaw Zajglic was the executor. By notice of motion filed on 30 August 2010, the defendant seeks an order that the costs payable by the plaintiff pursuant to Ball J's order be assessed on teh indemnity basis from 16 February 2010, being the date of an offer of compromise made under (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, Pt 20 Div 4.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate