NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Terry v O'Connell [2010] NSWSC 255
HEARING DATE(S) : 26/03/10
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 March 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : White J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 26 March 2010
DECISION : 1. Refuse the relief in para 3 of the summons; 2. order the plaintiff to pay any costs of the second defendant in relation to the application for the relief in para 3 of the summons.
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY - Caveats - application for extension of caveat - interest in land claimed pursuant to equitable charge or mortgage over land - no serious question to be tried that plaintiff entitled to charge or equitable mortgage over land - possible charge over proceeds of sale of land
LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)
Epple v Wilson [1972] VR 440 Simons v David Benge Motors Pty Ltd [1974] VR 585 Davies v Uratoriu (1995) 6 BPR 13,917 Luxury Homes Pty Ltd v Danieli [2005] NSWSC 379; (2005) 12 BPR 23,105 CASES CITED : Milton v Proctor (1989) NSW ConvR 55-450 Young v Lalic [2006] NSWSC 379 Morris v Morris [1982] 1 NSWLR 61 Wonderland Business Park Pty Ltd v Hartford Lane Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 86; (2001) 10 BPR 18,733 Malouf v O'Donohoe [2001] NSWSC 335 Bidmonta Pty Ltd v D'Angolo [2009] NSWSC 438
TEXTS CITED : Tyler, Young and Croft, Fisher and Lightwood's Law of Mortgage, 2nd Australian ed (2005) LexisNexis Butterworths PW Young, A Cahill & G Newton, Annotated Conveyancing and Real Property Legislation New South Wales, 2009 ed (2009) LexisNexis Butterworths
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate