NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Sewell v Zelden [2010] NSWSC 1180
HEARING DATE(S) : 5-8 July 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 September 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Rein J
Held that the first defendant breached his fiduciary duty to the plaintiff. DECISION : Held that the second and third defendants are liable for "knowing assistance" under the second limb of Barnes v Addy. Matter stood over for orders to be prepared based upon the findings contained in the reasons for judgment.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - fiduciary duties - breach - conflict of interest - defences to breach - disclosure and informed consent - where solicitor acted for client on sale of property owned by solicitor's wife's company, and proceeds of sale used to discharge mortgage on home of solicitor and solicitor's wife - whether solicitor breached fiduciary duty to client - EQUITY - second limb of Barnes v Addy ("knowing assistance") - whether solicitor's wife and company owned by her had knowledge of solicitor's dishonest and fraudulent breach of fiduciary duty to client - EQUITY - remedies - breach of fiduciary duty - account of profits - "profit" or "benefit" received by solicitor, solicitor's wife and company owned by her
LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Banque Commerciale SA (in liq) v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279 Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 147 Beach Petroleum NL v Kennedy (1999) 48 NSWLR 1 Boscauer v Bajwa [1996] 1 WLR 328 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Chan v Zacharia (1984) 154 CLR 178 Clark Boyce v Mouat [1994] 1 AC 428 Club of the Clubs Pty Ltd v King Network Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 574 Consul Development Pty Limited v DPC Estates Pty Limited (1974) 132 CLR 373 Entwells Pty Ltd v National & General Insurance Co Ltd (1991) 6 WAR 68 Farah Constructions Pty Limited v Say-Dee Pty Limited (2007) 230 CLR 89 Farrington v Rowe McBride & Partners [1985] 1 NZLR 83 Fitzpatrick v Waterstreet [2000] ANZ ConvR 15 Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 Hamilton v Whitehead (1988) 166 CLR 121 Heperu v Belle (2009) 258 ALR 727 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1983) 156 CLR 41 In re Head, Head v Head (No. 2) [1894] 2 Ch 23 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Limited v White City Tennis Club Limited; Walker Corporation Pty Limited v White City Tennis Club Limited [2010] HCA 19 CASES CITED : Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kation Pty Ltd v Lamru Pty Ltd; Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (in liq) (2009) 257 ALR 336 Kennedy v Wallace (2004) 142 FCR 185 King Network Group Pty Ltd v Club of the Clubs Pty Ltd (2008) 69 ACSR 172 Magafas v Carantinos [2007] NSWSC 416 Magafas v Carantinos [2007] NSWSC 917 Maguire v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449 Manly Council v Byrne [2004] NSWCA 123 Nocton v Lord Ashburton [1914] AC 932 O'Reilly v Law Society of New South Wales (1988) 24 NSWLR 204 Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 Phipps v Boardman [1967] 2 AC 46 Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 Rejfek v McElroy (1965) 112 CLR 517 Robins Incentive Dynamics Pty Ltd (in liq) (2003) 175 FLR 286 Say-Dee Pty Ltd v Farah Constructions Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 309 Spies v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 24 NSWLR 691 Tozer Kemsley & Millbourn (Australasia) Pty Ltd v Collier's Interstate Transport Service Ltd (1956) 94 CLR 384 Tyrell v The Bank of London (1862) 10 HLC 26 Warman International Limited v Dwyer (1995) 182 CLR 544
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate