NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wisdom v Payn [2011] NSWLEC 1012 Hearing dates: 17 January 2011 Decision date: 01 February 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Moore SC; Hewett AC Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) - is the likelihood of injury to a person falling from a ladder when trying to prune a vine a likelihood caused by the vine; is the height test in s 14A(1)(b) to be applied to some future anticipated height of a tree; is the test of what forms a hedge subjective or subject to identifiable indicators; can creation of a view of vegetation that might predominantly be of various weed species warrant an order under Part 2A of the Trees Act; can a person who planted a tree and then subdivided the land - selling the allotment upon which the tree is located - subsequently complain that the tree severely obstructs his view. Legislation Cited: Interpretation Act 1987 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Amendment Bill 2010 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Regulation 2007 Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152; (2008) 72 NSWLR 98; (2008) 159 LGERA 280 Tenacity Consulting v Warringah [2004] NSWLEC 140 Category: Principal judgment Parties: C & B Wisdom (Applicants) J & S Payn (Respondents) Representation: Mr J Hannaford, Hannaford Lawyers (Applicants) Ms A Johnstone, Thomsons Lawyers (Respondents) File Number(s): 20750 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate