NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Livestock Transport (Sydney) Pty Limited v Commonwealth of Australia [2011] NSWSC 7 Hearing dates: 21 September 2010 Decision date: 02 February 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Application dismissed. Parties to be heard as to costs. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application to have defences struck out - Whether test in General Steel softened by s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act - Whether defence of statutory immunity of quarantine officer open to be raised by the Commonwealth Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 56-58 Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth), s 82(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 14.28(1) Cases Cited: Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 Commonwealth v Griffiths [2007] NSWCA 370; 70 NSWLR 268 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner of Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; 112 CLR 125 Halpin v Lumley General Insurance Ltd [2009] NSWCA 372 Hans Pet Constructions Pty Limited v Cassar [2009] NSWCA 230 Little v The Commonwealth (1947) 75 CLR 94 Oceanic Crest Shipping Company v Pilbara Harbour Services Pty Limited (1986) 160 CLR 626 Spencer v Commonwealth [2010] HCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Livestock Transport (Sydney) Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Commonwealth of Australia (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: RW Seton SC with G Gemmell (Plaintiff) R Weber SC with S Nixon (Defendant) Solicitors: Indemnity Legal Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Blake Dawson Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 297821/2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate