NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Onus v Telstra Corporation Limited [2011] NSWSC 33 Hearing dates: 25 August 2010,2 September 2010,3 September 2010,7 October 2010 Decision date: 10 February 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Price J Decision: (1) Defendant is restrained from erecting any structure over a height of 18 metres at the property at 33 McIntosh Street, The Oaks, in the State of New South Wales, 2570 being the land comprised in folio identifier 21/730754 Catchwords: TORTS - quia timet injunction - whether intended height of Telecommunications tower a risk to safety of aircraft using plaintiff's airfield - whether public nuisance - whether plaintiff has standing - whether private nuisance - no emanation from defendant's land - whether substantial and unreasonable interference with plaintiff's land - extent of grant of quia timet relief Legislation Cited: Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (Cth) Cases Cited: Attorney-General v PYA Quarries Ltd [1957] 2 QB 169 Coalcliff Community Association Inc v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning [1999] NSWCA 317; (1999) 106 LGERA 243 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council, Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council [2001] HCA 29; (2001) 206 CLR 512 Commonwealth ex rel v VonBestecki, 30 Pa. D. & C. 137 (Pa.Com.Pl. 1937) Elston v Dore [1982] HCA 71; (1982) 149 CLR 480 Hargrave v Goldman [1963] HCA 56; (1963) 110 CLR 40 Hunter & Ors v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] 1 AC 655 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery [2007] HCA 6; (2007) 230 CLR 22 Manitoba (Attorney General) v Campbell (1983) 26 CCLT 168 McFadzean v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2007] VSCA 289; (2007) 20 VR 250 Melaleuca Estate Pty Ltd v Port Stephens Council [2006] NSWCA 31 Oakley v Simmons 799 SW 2d 669, (Tenn.Ct.App., 1990) R v Goldstein [2006] 1 AC 459 R v Rimmington [2006] 1 AC 459 Rickard v Allianz Australia Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1115 Robinson v Kilvert 41 ChD 88 Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152; (2008) 72 NSWLR 98 Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan [1940] AC 880 Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd [1954] 2 QB 182 Sutherland Shire Council v Becker [2006] NSWCA 344 Thompson-Schwab v Costaki [1956] 1 All ER 652; [1956] 1 WLR 335 United Airports Co of California v Hinman (1940) US Av R 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Grahame Dudley Onus (Plaintiff) Telstra Corporation Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J McCarthy QC with J O'Sullivan (Plaintiff) S Duggan SC with M McMahon (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate