NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DJF v R [2011] NSWCCA 6 Hearing dates: 17 December 2010 Decision date: 10 February 2011 Before: Giles JA at 1 Adams J at 18 RA Hulme J at 59 Decision: The time for bringing the appeal extended to 19August 2010, the appeal upheld, the convictions quashed and a new trial ordered. Catchwords: SEXUAL OFFENCES - applicant's wife did not give evidence - comment by prosecutor - post-incident conduct - whether consciousness of guilt - necessity for careful directions. Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s 279(1)(d)(i) Evidence Act 1995 ss 18, 20 and 23 Cases Cited: Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 R v Ho (2002) 130 A Crim R 545 R v Nguyen (2001) 118 A Crim R 479 R v Villar; R v Zugecic [2004] NSWCCA 302 Zoneff v The Queen (2000) 200 CLR 234 Category: Principal judgment Parties: DJF (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Odgers SC (Appellant) J Pickering (Crown) Solicitors: Voros Lawyers (Appellant) S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/2852 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2009-11-11 00:00:00 Before: Conlon DCJ File Number(s): 2009/2852
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate