NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Hearing dates: 17 December 2010 Decision date: 10 February 2011 Before: Giles JA at 1 Adams J at 2 R A Hulme J at 4 Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal and new trial - appeal against sentence - whether sufficient weight given to finding of special circumstances - no point of principle Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Bugmy v R [1990] HCA 181; 169 CLR 525 Fina'i v R [2006] NSWCCA 134 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Morgan & Morgan v R (1980) 7 A Crim R 146 Murphy v R [2007] NSWCCA 18 Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26; 131 CLR 623 R v Bernier (1998) 102 A Crim R 44 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 Trad v R [2009] NSWCCA 56 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Caristo (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Odgers SC (Applicant) Mr J Pickering (Respondent) Solicitors: The Law Practice Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2009/8481 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2009-10-23 00:00:00 Before: Tupman DCJ File Number(s): 2009/11/0453
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate