NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Stunden [2011] NSWCCA 8 Hearing dates: 8 December 2010 Decision date: 11 February 2011 Before: Simpson J at 1 Blanch J at 9 Garling J at 10 Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Set aside the sentence imposed in the District Court of NSW on 27 August 2010 in respect of the offence against s 33(1)(b) of the Crimes Act. (3) Mr Stunden is sentenced to a non-parole period of 2 years 6 months to commence from 3 September 2010, with the balance of the sentence being 2 years. The total sentence will conclude on 2 March 2015. (4) The first day upon which Mr Stunden will be eligible for release to parole is 2 March 2013. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against sentence - Appeal by Crown - Whether sentencing judge erred in making factual findings on the circumstances of the offence - Whether offender was provoked by the victim - Whether sentencing judge failed to take into account the need for personal and general deterrence - Whether no special circumstances found for departing from the statutory ratio between the non-parole period and the balance of sentence - Whether sentence is manifestly inadequate - Whether inappropriate for sentence to be served by periodic detention. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Lombard [2008] NSWCCA 110 Douar v R (2005) 159 A Crim R 154 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 49 Mirza v R [2007] NSWCCA 248 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434 R v AS [2006] NSWCCA 309 R v Burgess [2006] NSWCCA 319 R v Cheh [2009] NSWCCA 134 R v Davies [2004] NSWCCA 319 R v Hallocoglu (1992) 29 NSWLR 67 R v Hamieh [2010] NSWCCA 189 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Knight; R v Vivanua (2007) 176 A Crim R 338 R v Lombard (2008) 184 A Crim R 565 R v McEvoy [2010] NSWCCA 110 R v Mitchell; R v Gallagher (2007) 177 A Crim R 94 R v Mitchell; R v Gallagher (2007) 177 A Crim R 94 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) Ryan Peter Stunden (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V. Lydiard (Applicant) M. Austin (Respondent) Solicitors: Department of Public Prosecution (Applicant) Legal Aid New South Wales (Respondent) File Number(s): CCA 2009/198594 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Citation: Regina v Ryan Peter Stunden Date of Decision: 2010-08-27 00:00:00 Before: Finnane DCJ File Number(s): 2009/198594
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate