NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kennedy v Stockland Development Pty Ltd & Anor (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 10 Hearing dates: 2 February 2011 Decision date: 11 February 2011 Before: Pain J Decision: Notice of Motion seeking security for costs dismissed Catchwords: PROCEDURE - whether security for costs order ought be made in exercise of court's discretion - impecunious litigant unable to meet order if made - circumstances in Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 concerning natural persons not present - litigant acting in public interest as seeking to protect gazetted aboriginal place - whether case generally weak because interlocutory injunction refused - multiple challenges to same development by same applicant Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 61, s 62, Sch 6 Pt 4, s 69(3), s 98 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 75W, s 123 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 63 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 4.2(2) Local Government Act 1993 s 674 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 s 84, s 86(4), s 90 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 116(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Pt 42 r 42.21(1), Pt 42 r 42.3(2), Pt 51 r 51.50 Cases Cited: Burrell Place Community Action Group Incorporated v Griffith City Council [2009] NSWLEC 120 Carriage v Stockland (Constructors) Pty Ltd and Anor (No 2) [2002] NSWLEC 121 Carriage v Stockland (Constructors) Pty Ltd and Ors (No 2) [2002] NSWLEC 217; 123 LGERA 214 Diamond & Anor v Birdon Contracting Pty Limited & Anor [2007] NSWLEC 92 Green (as liquidator of Arimco Mining Pty Ltd) v CGU Insurance Ltd [2008] NSWCA 148; (2008) 67 ACSR 105 Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Limited v SST Consulting Pty Ltd and Ors; Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Limited v Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd (subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) and Ors [2009] HCA 43; (2009) 239 CLR 75 KP Cable Investments Pty Ltd v Meltglow Pty Ltd (1995) 56 FCR 189 Kennedy on behalf of the Sandon Point Aboriginal Tent Embassy v Director-General of the National Parks and Wildlife Service and Anor [2002] NSWLEC 67 Kennedy v Director General of the Department of Environment and Conservation and Stockland Development Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 325 Roy Kennedy v Director-General of the Department of Environment and Conservation and Anor [2006] NSWLEC 456 Kennedy (on behalf of Sandon Point Aboriginal Tent Embassy) v Minister for Planning (NSW) and Anor [2010] NSWLEC 129; (2010) 176 LGERA 395 Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 164 Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 177 Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 240 Kennedy v Stockland Development Pty Ltd and Anor [2010] NSWLEC 250 Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 269 King v Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd [1920] HCA 62; (1920) 28 CLR 289 Lucas v Yorke (1983) 50 ALR 228 Melville v Craig Nowlan & Associates Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 32; (2001) 54 NSWLR 82 Merribee Pastoral Industries Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1998] HCA 41; (1998) 193 CLR 502 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Rajski and Anor v Computer Manufacture and Design Pty Ltd and Ors [1982] 2 NSWLR 443 Rajski and Anor v Computer Manufacture and Design Pty Ltd and Ors [1983] 2 NSWLR 122 Reid's Farms Pty Ltd v Murray Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 127 Sales-Cini v Wyong City Council [2009] NSWLEC 201 Sharples v Minister for Local Government [2008] NSWLEC 67; (2008) 159 LGERA 391 Sky Design and Concepts Pty Limited v Pittwater Council (No 4) [2009] NSWLEC 129 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW, LexisNexis, Sydney to date (loose-leaf service at Service 52, January 2011) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Roy "Dootch" Kennedy (Applicant) Stockland Development Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Minister for Planning (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Oshlack (agent) (Applicant) Mr J Robson SC (First Respondent) Solicitors: Indigenous Justice Advocacy Network (Applicant) Herbert Geer (First Respondent) Submitting appearance (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 40880 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate