NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vesuvius Australia Pty Ltd (formerly known as Cookson Plibrico Pty Ltd) v V&M Davidovic Pty Limited (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 48 Hearing dates: 8 February 2011 Decision date: 15 February 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Hallen AsJ Decision: The Plaintiff's notice of motion to re-open dismissed with costs. Catchwords: Application to re-open judgement on basis of alleged procedural unfairness and alleged misapprehension of principles of law Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Limited (No 2) [2010] HCA 47 Brand v Monks [2010] NSWSC 313 Dey v Victorian Railway Commissioners [1949] HCA 1 Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Ltd [1983] HCA 25 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways [1964] HCA 69 Lean v Tumut River Orchard Management [2003] FCA 269 Spencer v The Commonwealth [2010] HCA 28 Theseus Exploration N.L. v Foyster [1972] HCA 41 Webster v Lampard [1993] HCA 57 Texts Cited: Equity Doctrines & Remedies, R Meagher et al, 4th ed, LexisNexis Butterworths Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Vesuvius Australia Pty Ltd (formerly known as Cookson Plibrico Pty Ltd) (Plaintiff) V & M Davidovic Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Coles QC; Mr P T Russell (Plaintiff) Mr S Wells (Defendant) Solicitors: Pikes Lawyers (Plaintiff) Rosier & Partners (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/84991
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate