NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BMDI Tuta Health Care Pty Limited v CME Medical Australia Limited [2011] NSWSC 50 Hearing dates: 15 February 2011 Decision date: 15 February 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Barrett J Decision: Amount of statutory demand reduced Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - whether genuine dispute as to amount of debt - debt said to arise from business sale agreement provisions for deferred purchase of stock - provisions ambiguous - intended meaning obscure - whether court should in these proceedings resolve competing contentions as to construction - parties in dispute as to correct construction - whether dispute genuine Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 459G, s 459H Cases Cited: BBX Holdings Ltd v American Home Assurance Co [2007] NSWSC 549 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council [2001] NSWCA 61; (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Delnorth Pty Ltd v State Bank of New South Wales (1995) 17 ACSR 379 Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 Spacorp Australia Pty Ltd v Myer Stores Ltd [2001] VSCA 89 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BMDI Tuta Healthcare Pty Limited - Plaintiff CME Medical Australia Limited - Defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr S Galitsky - Plaintiff Mr S Assaf - Defendant Solicitors: Websters - Plaintiff Teece Hodgson Ward - Defendant File Number(s): 2010/345983
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate