NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Amir v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2) [2011] NSWADT 27 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 09 February 2011 Before: M Hirschhorn, Judicial Member Decision: (1) The Applicant is awarded its *costs in the proceedings that were incurred in relation to the preparation of its case regarding the second limb of section 26(3)(a) Land Tax Management Act 1956 (NSW) ("LTMA') including costs of the costs application (* as agreed or assessed under the Legal Profession Act 2004). (2) The Applicant's application for costs, other than those referred to in order (1) above, is otherwise dismissed. (3) The Respondent's application for costs is dismissed. Catchwords: Costs Legislation Cited: Land Tax Management Act 1956 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Cases Cited: AT v Commissioner of Police, NSW [2010] NSWCA 131 Amir v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWADT 93 Western City Developments Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2) [2010] NSWADTAP 72 Jonamill Pty Ltd v Alramon Pty Ltd (No 2) (RLD) [2010] NSWADTAP 3 Valastar Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWADTAP 84 Perry Properties Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWADTAP 1 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Roger Amir (Applicant) Cheryl Amir (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: S Kaur-Bains (Respondent) A Blair (Applicant) File Number(s): 096092
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate